Honestly, the whole debate about whether AI-generated images count as "your original work" really needs to be sorted out once and for all.

More and more people are submitting AI-generated images for contests and commercial use, but how to determine the “originality” of these images has always been a gray area. The core debate is: does the prompt you type, the endless tweaking of parameters, and the selection process count as your intellectual input? Some people think clicking a mouse a few times to generate an image doesn’t make it original, while others argue that from the initial idea to countless iterations and selections, human decision-making is involved throughout.

I lean toward the latter, but only if you’re really deeply involved—not just tossing out a random prompt and letting the model do all the work.

This issue affects whether AI creations can be properly protected in the future and whether they can be used commercially. I get asked about it all the time when teaching students. Getting the standards sorted out sooner would be a good thing for people who take their work seriously.

Deep involvement vs. just throwing out a quick sentence — yeah, those really need to be treated differently.

The biggest concern for commercial use is this—if your images get stolen, there’s no way to fight for your rights.

Whether or not curating and picking the best results counts as “intellectual effort” is gonna be a debate that won’t be settled anytime soon.

Honestly, if a piece involves a ton of prompt engineering, I’d say that counts as original work.

Just a few clicks and claiming it’s original? Yeah, that doesn’t hold up.

Better set the standards early and clear, so us creators know where we stand.