Why Kling can't become Seedance in the short term, let's talk about the differences

Saw someone saying Kling can never become Seedance, figured I’d throw in my two cents. These two aren’t really on the same track: Kling’s going for a mass-market product approach—apps, templates, community, the whole package—huge user base; Seedance gives off more of a vibe focused on core capabilities and consistency refinement.

When people say “can’t become,” I don’t think it means Kling’s no good, but rather their goals and strengths are different—you can’t judge B by A’s standards.

Chinese video models are blooming everywhere right now. Instead of arguing who’ll replace who, let’s see who nails the experience on their own path. Do you guys think these two should even be compared side by side?

It’s not even the same approach in the first place. Kinda clickbait-y with that title.

Kling wins on ecosystem and user base, nobody can deny that.

Seedance’s consistency is seriously impressive, but does the average person even need it?

Everyone’s got their own way of doing things. No point in trying to rank who’s better.

1 Like

Same question. These two don’t even have overlapping target users, right?

It’s already pretty impressive that domestic companies have managed to crank out so many players in this space. :100:

That title is pretty provocative, huh

Yeah, for real.

regular people don’t actually need that strong of consistency, a template is enough and that’s it